This chapter had some very
innovative teaching methods that I will probably utilize in my classroom. There
was a lot of good information on how and when to assess students. One of the
sections that I thought posed some really great insight was the limitations
section. The author talked about a very serious problem that teachers are bound
to see sometime in their career. The problem is that students have been groomed
their entire schooling life to thinking that knowing information is the main
focus of learning. The author spoke about how a student can know the difference
between first person and third person, but they may not know how to apply that
knowledge to texts. What is the point of knowing information if they don’t know
how to apply it to anything? That’s like having a person know everything about
Michael Jordan’s free throw shot technique, yet they can’t even go out and
shoot a basket for themselves. Students need to learn how to apply knowledge to
actual texts. This idea of just knowing information also puts students at risk
to aim to get the right answer in every situation rather than to learn about
underlying meanings, themes, messages, and other important contextual
information.
I’m
always looking for alternatives to traditional testing. I’m not really sure if
it’s because of how much I was drilled in high school with multiple-choice
tests, traditional essays, and formal assessments, but I look to stray away
from those types of testing as much as I can. So naturally the section about
alternative testing methods was one of the first areas that sparked my
interest. The ones that intrigued me the most were journals/blogs, student
centered formal written essays, and classroom discussion. Recently I’ve noticed
how productive and insightful journals can be. Giving students the chance to
voice their opinion, as an assessment can be extremely fruitful. Students will
see the purpose in the writing because it’s something that they can engage
themselves in. You can utilize journals as a formative assessment throughout
the entire year. This will help their writing skills and it connects standards
at the same time. The student-centered formal written assignments can play off
of the journals. I think having an open ended topic for students to choose from
can lead to some of the students best writing. I also thought having classroom
discussion as an assessment was interesting. I like the idea of students being
assessed based on their conversation in class.
The
Secondary Standards-Based Grading and Reporting Handbook also provided some
great insight to a newly developed way of grading students. I thought that the
author made some really valid points when he went through each principle.
Principle 1 and 2 talked about being graded on specified goals and how evidence
used for grading should be valid. I think that telling our students about our
clear expectations and goals that we for them is going to provide students with
an end goal in mind and motivation to learn the material better. I also agree
that grading needs to have valid evidence. This keeps us as teachers in check
to help students fix their mistakes and learn what needs to be learned.
Principle 4 was also something that I really enjoyed reading into. Not
everything should be included in grades. We can’t scrutinize students for every
piece of homework that they turn in. If we are writing a paper and we ask for a
first draft, we shouldn’t expect it to be anywhere near perfect. Why would we
grade something that we expected would have mistakes? I think that we have to look at what should be graded and
what shouldn’t be graded based on what will help the student increase their
knowledge and ability to apply that knowledge to other texts the most. The last
thing that I found interesting was the idea of not having zeros in your grading
system. I’m not sure how I feel about this concept and would love to hear
others opinions on this method.
No comments:
Post a Comment